OSHA consults industry on silica standard refinements

iStock 182689266

OSHA is seeking industry input on its respirable crystalline silica standard for construction, and is taking comments until Oct. 15.

Specifically, OSHA would like information on the effectiveness of work practice and engineering controls that limit worker exposure to respirable silica, as well as tasks and equipment related to silica exposure that are not currently included in Table 1 of the standard.

OSHA is also asking for information and comments as to whether there are potential scenarios when general industry and maritime employers that are already covered by silica standards for those industries should comply with the silica standard for construction. In addition to requesting information and comments, the agency is also asking for exposure data that could help it determine whether it should revise the standards.

Table 1 of the silica standard for construction outlines the proper control measures to be taken when performing tasks using specific pieces of equipment related to silica exposure.

For example, when workers are using stationary masonry saws, the accompanying engineering and work practice control methods would be to ensure that the saw is equipped with an integrated water delivery system that continuously feeds water to the blade and to use the saw in accordance with the manufacturer’s dust control instructions.

Table 1 requirements also include control measures for handheld power saws, walk-behind saws, drivable saws; rig-mounted core saws and drills; handheld and stand-mounted drills; dowel drilling rigs for concrete; vehicle-mounted drilling rigs for rock and concrete; jackhammers and handheld powered chipping tools; handheld grinders for mortar removal; handheld grinders for other uses; walk-behind milling machines and floor grinders; and small, drivable milling machines.

But even with such detailed control measures in place, OSHA might have determined that some workers can still be exposed to respirable crystalline silica dust, thus the request for information on how to tighten up protections.

According to an early-2019 study conducted by researchers at the Department of Public Health at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, workers on construction projects, as well as bystanders, can still be exposed to respirable silica during chipping and crushing activities, even when taking the protective steps outlined in Table 1. Even when using cartridge respirators, chipping worker exposure exceeded OSHA’s permissible exposure limit (PEL) within 15 minutes. Crushing machine tenders exceeded the PEL within two hours.

Source: Construction Dive

Similar Posts

  • AI, robotics safety a bigger concern to construction industry than job security

    A Volvo Construction Equipment survey of 205 U.S. and U.K. construction workers found that 31% of respondents were fearful that artificial intelligence and robotics would replace them on jobsites. While that is a common conception about the technology, an even larger chunk, 46%, was concerned about perceived safety risks involved with that kind of machinery….

  • It’s Time to Expand in the Great State of Texas

    Look out California, Texas is now the top state to do business in, and for Minority, Women and Veteran-Owned Businesses, that means it is time to expand! Why are companies leaving California? A recent study by Joseph Vranich from Spectrum Location Solutions showed that from 2008 to 2016 more than 13,000 businesses left California and…

  • How construction robots can amplify workers’ expertise

    Construction jobsites will one day be bustling with “terminator-type,” humanoid robots, according to Scott Peters, president and co-founder of Construction Robotics, but that future may be a long ways off for the industry. For now, the Victor, New York-based company recognizes that human workers have unique expertise and problem-solving skills to offer, and that to increase…

  • 5 Reasons Why Construction Companies Need a CRM Today

    Technology is rapidly changing the game in the construction industry, and the firms who are paying attention and embracing the change will be the ones who win. KPMG’s annual report, “Building a technology advantage — Global Construction Survey” reports that 55 percent feel the industry is ripe for change with 74 percent of respondents saying…

  • The other fatal 4: report warns of less-considered major construction health hazards

    Ask anyone familiar with construction hazards, and you’ll likely hear about those on OSHA’s Top 10 Safety Violations annual list or the agency’s Fatal Four — falls, struck-by incidents, electrocutions and caught-in-between accidents. The danger of falls, in particular, has garnered the industry’s attention as the most common cause of accidental construction injuries and deaths. And the agency has…